Why Women’s decide not to work – Reasons
The phenomenon of adequate income in the family to meet most expenditure and manage some funds has led to one evident change, more women are deciding not to go to work if they can afford to.
While young women’s involvement in the workforce has risen importantly over time, married women are progressively rising off the employment curved shape, in what is seen as an onerous responsibility of managing home, children and work. This is not a new burden. Many women who visited add the sooner generations struggled through these problems. They also lived in more traditionalistic households and did not settle on their role at home for work. They struggled with the deficiency of reliable daycare, restricted transport facilities, and fewer choices to eat out and spend on help as the present generation of working women are able to do.
This is why I see this trend as one triggered by economic prosperity. Women of the earlier generations did not give themselves a choice—the income they earned was important for the family. If they chose to remain at home, it meant compromising not just on one’s lifestyle, but also on money available for the higher education of children, health care for the family, care of the old and retirement security for the couple.
As incomes increased, many women were able to step back and reassess the need to kill themselves trying to manage home and work. The security of adequate income and accumulated assets led many to seem at work as a choice, not as a compulsory requirement. This led to at least two divergent outcomes.
The first was the rise in meaningful choices, both for the household and society. Women now choose an opportunity in their career after having a baby. Earlier, those working in a PSU could get a year’s leave without pay after maternity leave. Those within the private sector risked losing their jobs. It is now common for ladies to return back to seek out a replacement job or acquire skills to start something that matches with their new circumstance.
Why women prefer to work from home
Women work from home, taking over jobs that don’t require a commute. They choose jobs that pay them by the hour. They combat entrepreneurship to regulate their work hours, place and nature of labor. There is a choice, and that is welcome. There is evidence to show that some well-qualified women, who could otherwise earn and contribute to their household and to the economy, now choose to pursue other interests in volunteering and social entrepreneurship.
What is an adverse outcome? The woman who isn’t working outside her house is increasingly seen with greater envy by the one who continues to figure and run a home. The occupy home mother appears at the PTA, groomed to the last painted toe, armed with all the knowledge about every activity within the school, and flaunts her influence with teachers and staff, having volunteered at college. The employed woman can’t match this. At social events, holidays, reunions, and such, the woman with time on her hand is the one who is more fashionable, knows much more relevant information, holds diverse conversations, and is better networked. Not always, but mostly. My friends who work know what I’m talking about.
The point I am making is it has now become fairly latest to not go to work. The woman who is not following a career has through various social signals, established that she is living a better life. There is no sulking or inferiority complex, but a flash of the sufficiency of income, assets and financial condition, that she is in a place where she does not have to push herself.
It has now become in vogue in some women’s circles to not be a slave to the occupation that requires compromise, commute, and adversity. There was a generation of women that shrink at the lack of economic independence, and asking the husband for money was impossible. There are still women who believe that formal employment offers significant advantages over part-time pursuits and entrepreneurship.